![]() ![]() ![]() While we have yet to test the Studio, if you’re in need of an uber-powerful Apple desktop there is no contest here when it comes to the specs. The Mac Studio's new M1 Ultra chip is one of the most powerful processors available to consumers at the moment. Meanwhile, the 24-inch M1 iMac stands strong as a great-value all-in-one desktop with enough power for most people, but if you’ve been hungry to know how its 8-core processor stacks up against the Mac Studio’s M1 Max or the monstrous 20-core M1 Ultra, we’ve broken down the differences between the iMac and the Mac Studio in this specs only comparison.īuy the Apple Mac Studio from Best Buy Performance To replace the aging 27-inch iMac and bridge the gap between the M1 Macs and the Mac Pro, Apple introduced the Mac Studio, a little square box of a computer with some insane specs that make it a top contender for creative professionals. ![]() From versatile all-in-one options like the Apple iMac to powerful professional workstations like the Mac Pro, Apple wants to make a desktop option for everyone. The M3 MacBook Pro may launch sooner than anyone expectedĪpple’s 32-inch M3 iMac could be facing yet another delayĪpple Mac Studio vs.Apple has long been the favorite for desktop users who want a machine that’s a little more aesthetically pleasing than the big, boxy towers that permeate the market. This Windows laptop costs under $1,000 and handily beats the MacBook Air And this is just a mini PC - it’s hard to imagine what kind of power the next iteration of the Mac Pro will possess once it’s finally released with Apple silicon. This means that for one-fifth of the price of the Mac Pro, the Mac Studio delivers performance many levels above it. The price tag alone begs for comparison, considering that the M1 Ultra Mac Studio costs $4,000. However, that doesn’t change the fact that the Mac Pro used as a comparison in iJustine’s video is a $20,000 computer aimed at professionals. Mac Pro remains, as of yet, left out when it comes to these huge changes. After all, Apple’s move to using its own silicon and also upgrading said silicon to its latest version is a big deal. Of course, pitting the Intel-based Mac Pro from nearly three years ago against the fresh Mac Studio may seem unfair. Apple’s new mini PC defeats the 2019 Mac Pro without breaking a sweat. ![]() That may have impacted the final result, but it didn’t make it any less impressive. The Mac Studio was also running several other resource-heavy applications, such as Photoshop and FCP X, while rendering the video. Given that the M1 Ultra contains two M1 Max chips stitched together, double the performance is what we expected from the chip, and that is essentially what we’re getting here. The Mac Pro, still running an Intel Xeon processor (albeit with up to 28 cores), needed over 10 minutes to complete the task. The 13-inch MacBook Pro with the basic M1 chip needed a whopping 24 minutes and 21 seconds. The M1 Max MacBook Pro needed 6 minutes and 39 seconds to render the video. Mondobytes went on to compare this to other renders of the same video he’d done on his own hardware, and the results are staggering. The Apple Mac Studio was able to render 11:39 minutes of footage in just 3 minutes and 31 seconds. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |